2006 August
by Randy Hines
BOPPARD, Germany—International news
coverage is always a concern in newsrooms. Studies have shown that
readers would like to see more of it. Yet, you don’t want to go
overboard and dish out too much. How to find that perfect balance is
a struggle for most Utah newspapers.
One major story that
escaped American media for a long time this summer was the
transformation that took place in the host country of the FIFA 2006
World Cup. Perhaps journalists were more concerned with covering
soccer matches throughout Germany than doing a little history and
observing the magnitude of what was taking place.
After all,
FIFA estimates that each match during the 16-team World Cup had a
worldwide television audience of 350 million, which dwarfs the 95
million who tuned in the 2006 Super Bowl.
ESPN finally
mentioned briefly—during Germany’s semifinal loss to
Italy—the show of nationalism that had spread throughout the
country. It had been touched on in a few German publications, but
those are neither regular nor random reading materials for U.S.
sportswriters.
Unlike fans in other countries that worship
soccer, who seem always to display fanatical behavior to extremes
during their matches, German citizens have been reared in a society
that frowns on such behavior. Culturally, Germans are hard-working,
serious citizens. Longtime, next-door neighbors still greet one
another formally as Mr. Schmidt and Mrs. Jones.
Patriotism
was practically banned because of what happened when Hitler’s
fervor swept the nation before and during World War II. Except for
souvenir shops and public buildings, I rarely had seen German flags
on display in four previous trips to this country. How that has
changed over the summer. Politicians and journalists earlier this
year were debating how to show support for the German team that
qualified for the World Cup, without shocking the rest of the world
into thinking that right-wing radicalism was alive and well.
“There
was a lot of displaying of flags on automobiles,” said American
Jim Sunthimer, who has lived here for 30 years. “I had never
seen that in the past. Other nations had no problem waving their
flags from cars after a victory. The Germans were a little
reluctant.”
The owner of Hotel Günther in Boppard,
Sunthimer added that the baby boomer generation is not ashamed of
their nation. “I think (they) have a right to feel proud of the
country and its accomplishments.”
One of my students
from Germany, who studied at Susquehanna University in fall 2005, is
mesmerized by the transformation of her homeland since returning to
the University of Konstanz in January.
“It is a totally
new experience for the Germans now,” said Frederike Nolten, 22.
“This country turned upside down.”
Miss Nolten
admits to not having sung her national anthem before because she
never learned how. She said she had never owned a German flag, which
appeared all over the country, from homes, automobiles and
individuals to clothing and faces painted black, red and gold.
“I
enjoy the new feeling now and the first time we’ve had the
chance to be proud of this country,” she added.
Even
though displays of Nazism are legally banned, the topic is not
forgotten. School children learn about the horrors of that
dictatorship during all eight years of public schooling. When the
still-popular Hogan’s Heroes reruns appear on German TV, the
salute and “Heil Hitler” statement are replaced with such
German expressions as “The corn is this high” or “My
nephew is this tall.”
But the most-watched television
event of the year did not contribute international stories beyond the
actual matches for sports pages back in the U.S.
Both
newspaper and television audiences have expressed a desire for more
international coverage. A 2004 study by the Radio and Television News
Directors Foundation found that local viewers wanted more
international stories, but with a local context. Their suggestions on
what could be shortened from the newscasts were topped by crime news
and the weather.
As more communities become more diverse with
an international flavor, the local press will reflect that in its
coverage. For example, Vietnam stories will have more impact in
multicultural cities of Oregon than, say, Michigan, where Ontario
datelines get displayed.
Unfortunately, international
coverage has never been more dangerous. Last year saw a record number
of deaths of reporters. Journalists today are just as likely to be
shot as soldiers. Freedom of the press has never been cheap.
Dr.
Randy Hines teaches in the Department of Communications at
Susquehanna University in Selinsgrove, Pa. He is in Germany this
summer for academic research and a family wedding. He can be
contacted at randyhinesapr@yahoo.com.
By John Foust, Raleigh, NC
“Ever since I started selling
advertising,” Marla told me, “I’ve heard about the
importance of referrals. But the problem is that most sales people do
a poor job of asking for them.”
She’s right. The
standard request for referrals goes something like this: “Here’s
my business card. If you know of anyone who wants to advertise in the
paper, let me know.” That kind of request is not likely to
inspire people to reach for their Rolodexes, is it?
“Generic
requests are okay in some circumstances,” Marla said, “but
they rarely produce immediate results. I talked to a lot of other
sales people – many of them outside the ad business –
looking for a better way to get referrals. Along the way, I learned a
technique that is designed to generate leads on the spot. It’s
based on the idea that you have customers who already know people who
are good prospects for you, but they need help in seeing those people
as prospects.”
If you’d like to try Marla’s
approach, here are three points to keep in mind:
1. Pick the
right time. The two best times to ask for a referral are (1) as soon
as a sale is finalized and (2) as soon as an ad campaign starts
producing results. You want to catch them at a time when they feel
good about the decision to advertise in your paper. That increases
the likelihood that they will want others to follow their lead.
2.
Paint a word picture. In sales presentations, it’s important to
help prospects think visually – to help them see their
businesses being advertised on the printed page. (Isn’t that
what we do all the time with spec ads?) Why not do the same thing in
asking for referrals?
Say something like, “I wonder if
you will help me with something? I’m looking for someone who
runs a business in town. They’ve been around for a few months –
maybe a year or two – but they’re still searching for the
right way to reach potential customers. They’ve tried some
advertising, but nothing long term. Do you know anyone who fits that
description?”
3. Narrow the focus. “You want to
be specific enough to help them visualize potential prospects,”
Marla said, “but not so specific that you limit the
possibilities. Don’t say, ‘I’m looking for someone
who has a $3,000 monthly budget’ or ‘Can you think of a
business that is trying to reach married couples between the ages of
25 and 50?’”
Every industry has a network. It’s
a sure bet that your customers know more about their regular contacts
than they know about anyone else. So if you’re talking to a car
dealer, look for links to companies that supply products or services
to that dealer. And if you’re talking to a store owner, ask
about new and existing businesses in the neighborhood.
“This
technique has generated more leads than anything else I’ve
tried,” Marla said. “Some of my customers have actually
looked through their files to find prospects for me.”
(c)
Copyright 2006 by John Foust. All rights reserved.
John Foust
conducts on-site and video training for newspaper advertising
departments. His three new video programs are designed to help ad
managers conduct in-house training for their sales teams. For
information, contact: John Foust, PO Box 97606, Raleigh, NC 27624
USA, E-mail: jfoust@mindspring.com,
Phone 919-848-2401.
|
By Tom Larimer,
Arkansas Press Association
finding that building their Web presence can
only help them strengthen their position as the only game in town.
Readers of the Tinyville Herald Eagle Bugle Gazette still have to
turn to it as the only source of wall-to-wall coverage of last
night’s zoning board meeting; but once the website is up and
running, they’re less concerned about the fact that the
paperboy tossed today’s issue in the sinkhole out
front.
Top 10 for community papers
|
By Joel Campbell
While the horror stories resulting from the
three-year old federal health privacy regulations are still mounting,
there are two recent court cases that offer support for access to
public records officials want to close in the name of privacy.
In
June 2006, the Texas Court of Appeals ruled that the federal Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) does not trump
the Texas open records law. Judges ordered that state to release
statistics about alleged sexual assaults at mental hospitals.
The
case started back in 2003, the same year the HIPAA regulations went
into effect. Joe Ellis, an investigative producer at Dallas-based
KDFW TV, learned about a female patient at a state institution who
had become pregnant. He requested statistics on alleged sexual
assault and abuse incidents at state mental hospitals, subsequent
investigations, and the outcome of any investigations. Ellis did not
ask for victim's names, but the locations of the assaults.
The
Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation cited HIPAA
and denied Ellis' request. The Texas Attorney General disagreed and
said that HIPAA did not preempt the state's open records law and said
HIPAA allows disclosure of health information if it is "required
by law." A district court judge rejected the attorney general's
argument but bought the department's line. The four-judge Court of
Appeals rejected the department's logic saying that just because
public records laws aren't listed in the HIPAA rules doesn't mean
they don't apply. (Abbott v. Texas Department of Mental Health and
Mental Retardation).
In March, the Ohio Supreme Court also
reached a similar conclusion, ruling that Cincinnati Enquirer
reporters had a right to look at lead paint violations. Journalists
had asked the Cincinnati Health Department to provide "copies of
the 343 lead citations and any others that were issued between 1994
and the present." The city balked, citing HIPAA including a
claim that it was a "covered entity" under the federal
HIPAA rules.
The Enquirer asked the appeals court to
overrule but judges voted against the records release. On appeal, the
Supreme Court ruled that lead citations and related reports did not
contain protected health information as defined by
HIPAA.
Furthermore, Supreme Court justices explained that,
even if the citations and reports contained protected health
information and even if it is determined the Health Department
operated as a "covered entity" as defined by HIPAA, the
requested reports would still be public under the "required by
law" exception in HIPAA (Cincinnati Enquirer v. Daniels).
Many
legal experts see these two rulings as a promising way for the public
to continue to get information it needs about important issues, such
as lead paint poisoning and sexual abuse in mental institutions. SPJ
chapters and members can be leaders in citing the "required by
law" HIPAA exception in other states to open records of public
interest. At the same time, there is still plenty of bad news created
by the over broad interpretation of HIPAA.
In May, the
Louisiana Supreme Court voted to not hear a case where the state
refused to release information in 911 calls. The calls were made in
2005 from the private Baton Rouge residence of then-Secretary of
State Fox McKeithen the day he suffered a paralyzing fall. The
Gannett Co.'s Louisiana newspapers and the state's press association
sued the city-parish a month after the accident to try to get the 911
calls (Hill v. E. Baton Rouge Parish Department of Emergency Medical
Services).
Officials with the city-parish Emergency Medical
Services refused to make the recordings public, claiming the HIPAA
protected medical information in the calls.
A state district
judge who listened to the tapes ruled that McKeithen's privacy rights
outweighed the public interest in the call contents. Judges at the
1st Circuit Court of Appeal voted 2-1 to keep the records
confidential. Judges agreed with the medical services' contention
that those calling 911 should feel they can talk candidly without
fear of embarrassment from any future public disclosure. The
appellate court panel also found EMS should be considered a
health-care provider and therefore protected from public disclosure
by HIPAA.
In March, Nevada's attorney general's office issued
an opinion saying that social service or welfare agencies can't
reveal records about cases where child abuse resulted in death.
That's even after officials received a letter from an official with
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services saying that the
federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act includes "specific
reporting elements pertaining to child fatalities that should be
required and potentially made public," according to the Las
Vegas Review-Journal.
In Rhode Island, weeks after a Superior
Court judge ruled that he be allowed to attend the municipal Police
Academy, a Woonsocket police recruit remained assigned to clerical
duty at the city's Police Department, while officials hid behind
HIPAA rules so they didn't have to explain why. In Texas, details of
a murderer's death "from natural causes" still remain a
mystery after prison officials cited HIPAA
Across Utah, fire
departments and police agencies still refuse to provide information
citing HIPAA. For example, a Wisconsin fire department refuses to
give even the time that fire calls came in. That's despite that many
agencies are not considered "covered entities" under the
law and some attorney generals have ruled that police reports aren't
subject to HIPAA.
As journalists begin digging they shouldn't
simply take public official's line that the information they seek is
protected by HIPAA. It may not be.
Joel Campbell is UPA's
legislative monitor. A former reporter and editor, he is an assistant
professor in the Brigham Young University Department of
Communications, Provo, Utah. He can be reached at
joelcampbell@byu.edu.
By Ed Henninger
The beauty of The Rule of Three (yes, I cap
each word, out of reverence for the rule) is that it can help to make
life less difficult for you as a designer, an editor—and a
publisher.
It does that by dictating that we use only three
type faces throughout the design of a newspaper. It’s a rule
many designers (yours truly included) choose to live by because it
helps create a clear, consistent and comfortable design. Clear,
consistent, comfortable—and not that other “c”
word: complicated.
Following The Rule of Three, we
use:
TYPEFACE ONE for headlines.
TYPEFACE TWO for accessories
such as subheads, pullouts and other display elements.
TYPEFACE
THREE for text.
Using only these three families—always—helps
make your design more consistent from issue to issue and eventually
creates a strong comfort level for your readers. And, please, don’t
even go there with trying to claim that The Rule of Three limits your
creativity. That’s bunk.
Here are some tips on The Rule
of Three:
GO FOR THE GOLD: When choosing your type
families—especially your headline faces—go for those that
are proven winners. Remember that your readers expect you to be good,
not different. Look for classic headline faces. Some serifs to look
at: Bauer Bodoni, Berkeley, Caslon 224, Concord, Garamond Condensed,
Kepler Standard, Photina, Walbaum Book. Sans serifs that work well:
Akzidenz Grotesk, Frutiger, Futura Condensed, Formata, Myriad Pro.
Fort text, look at: Nimrod, Cheltenham, Utopia.
ALL IN THE
FAMILY: When choosing your type face, also look for a family that is
extended. Photina, for example, offers at least eight fonts in the
family. Myriad Pro lets you choose from among 40 fonts. And Kepler
Standard? Well, there are 168 fonts in that family. Now, tell me you
can’t be creative with that!
CREATIVE LICENSE: Use the
different fonts in a family (see Kepler Standard, just above) to give
your pages a fresh look without departing from The Rule of Three. If
you have fewer fonts in a type face (Caslon 224 is limited to four),
you can use these in a creative fashion on those pages where
creativity is called for. Some suggestions: all caps, small caps, in
color, with a soft shadow, with a baseline shift.
TEXTING,
TEXTING: Let’s avoid being too creative in text. Remember that
readers get 80% or more of the information you provide by reading
text. Keep it simple. Keep it clean. Keep it large enough—without
getting into what I call “See Spot Run” typography—14
point on 18 spacing just doesn’t work for newspapers though
there are probably some readers who would welcome it.
STYLE
GUIDE IT: Once you’ve done your mockups and made your decisions
on how you’re going to apply The Rule of Three at your
newspaper, write down your amendments to The Rule of Three. Put them
into your Design Style Guide. You do have a Design Style Guide, don’t
you? Don’t you?
THE RULE OF TWO: An adjunct to The Rule
of Three, The Rule of Two simply states that in some cases, you can
actually use only two type face families to achieve the same effect.
For example, fonts of Kepler Standard serve very well as text as well
as headlines and other display elements. The same is true for
Photina.
THE RULE OF FOUR. There’s a time when you may
really need that fourth type face. For details, visit Ed Henninger’s
web site at www.henningerconsulting.com and leave a request with an
e-mail address. We’ll fill you in.
ED HENNINGER is
an independent newspaper consultant and the Director of Henninger
Consulting. Offering comprehensive newspaper design services
including redesigns, workshops, training and evaluations. E-mail:
edh@henningerconsulting.com.
On the web: henningerconsulting.com. Phone: 803-327-3322.
Dear Friend of Education:
Great newspapers require
journalists who are proficient in writing, keenly aware of our
federal and state laws and possess strong ethical values. Community
newspapers provide the public with information, education and
entertainment. The informed individual is the most elemental building
block of our democracy.
The mission of the National Newspaper
Association Foundation is “to enhance literacy, print
journalism and the role of community newspapers.” The
Foundation endeavors to achieve this goal by attracting individuals
to this exciting and challenging industry and offering educational
opportunities and professional development for newspapermen and women
to enhance their skills and/or prepare them for the future.
It
is an honor to invite you to join NNAF in preserving and
strengthening America’s community newspapers through a
tax-deductible contribution to the NNAF Silent Auction.
Please see
the enclosed brochure for details.
Your contribution will
support the following programs:
• Community Building
Symposium – the only presentation of community journalism
research of its kind in the country; co-sponsored by the Huck Boyd
National Center for Community Media at Kansas State University.
•
Alan Cruikshank Scholars program – a partnership with the
Missouri School of Journalism at the University of Missouri at
Columbia to prepare graduate students with the skills needed at
community newspapers.
With your generous support, NNAF can
expand these programs and build on its success. Your participation in
the 2006 NNAF Annual Silent Auction will help secure the vitality of
the community newspaper industry now and for years to
come.
Sincerely,
Bob Sweeney,
President
National
Newspaper Association Foundation
P.S. No goods or services
will be provided in exchange for your donation. Your donation is tax
deductible to the extent allowed by law.
Download form here